Current:Home > MyHow Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court -Wealth Evolution Experts
How Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-12 19:02:15
Washington — The Biden administration announced Friday that it will wipe out $39 billion in student debt for more than 800,000 borrowers, relief that comes weeks after the Supreme Court invalidated a separate, broader effort by President Biden to address student loan debt.
Unlike the broad forgiveness Mr. Biden originally attempted to provide, the forthcoming debt discharges by the Department of Education are narrower, stemming from "fixes" announced by the administration in April 2022 to ensure borrowers enrolled in income-driven repayment plans have an accurate count of the number of monthly payments that go toward forgiveness.
The new student debt plan also relies on a different law than the one that was struck down by the Supreme Court. Under the 1965 Higher Education Act and federal regulations, a borrower is eligible for loan forgiveness after making 240 or 300 qualifying monthly payments — roughly 20 or 25 years of payments — on an income-driven repayment plan or standard repayment plan. The administration said "inaccurate payment counts" caused borrowers to lose "hard-earned progress" toward having their loans forgiven, which it has sought to remedy.
Loans covered include Direct Loans or Federal Family Education Loans held by the Department of Education, including Parent PLUS Loans.
The Supreme Court student loan decision
The latest announcement from the Department of Education is part of the Biden administration's efforts to provide relief to Americans with student loan debt, and is different from the program struck down by the Supreme Court late last month.
Under that plan, which the court's conservative majority said is unlawful, eligibility depended on income. Borrowers earning up to $125,000 annually could have up to $10,000 in student debt forgiven. Qualifying Pell Grant recipients, students with the greatest financial need, who met the income threshold could have had up to an additional $10,000 in relief.
That plan by the Biden administration was far more sweeping, with an estimated 40 million Americans eligible for relief, 20 million of whom would have had their loan balances erased.
The program also relied on a different law — the HEROES Act — than the loan discharges announced Friday. The HEROES Act authorizes the education secretary to "waive or modify" student financial assistance programs for borrowers "in connection" with a national emergency, such as the pandemic.
But the Supreme Court disagreed, finding the administration overstepped its authority with its plan to erase $430 billion in student debt.
The court also invoked the so-called "major questions" doctrine in part of its ruling, a legal theory that holds there must be clear congressional authorization for an executive branch agency to decide an issue of "vast economic or political significance."
The "economic and political significance" of the loan forgiveness plan, Roberts wrote, "is staggering by any measure." The court ruled that the education secretary could modify "existing statutory or regulatory provisions" under the Education Act, but "not to rewrite that statute from the ground up."
veryGood! (76442)
Related
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Shadowy Hamas leader in Gaza is at top of Israel’s hit list after last month’s deadly attack
- Utah Tech women’s hoops coach suspended for 2 games after investigation based on player complaints
- Candace Cameron Bure’s Son Lev Is Engaged
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Ohio Walmart mass shooting possibly motivated by racist ideology, FBI says
- Diamondbacks acquire third baseman Eugenio Suarez in deal with Mariners
- WHO asks China for more information about rise in illnesses and pneumonia clusters
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- 10 days after India tunnel collapse, medical camera offers glimpse of 41 men trapped inside awaiting rescue
Ranking
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- Argentina’s President-elect is racing against the clock to remake the government
- Stores open on Black Friday 2023: See hours for Walmart, Target, Best Buy, Home Depot, more
- Jennifer Lawrence Brushes Off Her Wardrobe Malfunction Like a Pro
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- Notre Dame honored transfer QB Sam Hartman, and his former coach at Wake Forest hated it
- 4-day truce begins in Israel-Hamas war, sets stage for release of dozens of Gaza-held hostages
- Jamie Foxx accused of 2015 sexual assault at a rooftop bar in new lawsuit
Recommendation
Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
Republic of Congo marks a day of mourning for 31 dead in a stadium stampede
New Mexico Supreme Court reprimands judge who advised prosecutors in case involving his daughter
Prosecutors ask to effectively close case against top Italian, WHO officials over COVID-19 response
Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
Witnesses describe vehicle explosion at U.S.-Canada border: I never saw anything like it
WHO asks China for more information about rise in illnesses and pneumonia clusters
8 Family Members Killed in 4 Locations: The Haunting Story Behind The Pike County Murders